Quite masterfully paced and one of those rewarding movies that seems to get better and better as it progresses.

God I hope this movies is this good!!!

This review comes to us from Finland. There was a single press screening there. The reviewer has never read the books, but is now so in love with the story that he’s pissed that he has to wait another 2 years for the payoff!

Read it. Beware of some spoilers.

Good retelling of the sci-fi classic. Only the ending left me with a bad taste in my mouth.

##The Original

The original **Planet of the Apes** movie is among the classics of science fiction cinema. And the fact that it starred Charlton Heston only added to its credibility.

##What orders?

Mark Wahlberg’s plays a pilot in the US Airforce around the year 2029. He’s assigned to an orbiting space station that’s using genetically engineered monkey’s and apes to fly high-risk missions. One day his favorite monkey gets in trouble when he is sent out to investigate a magnetic storm that’s heading for the station and the storm forces his pod off course.

Mark Wahlberg, not willing to let his monkey die, and itching to get out into space himself decides to take a pod after the monkey, defying his commanders orders. His pod gets thrown around by the storm, and he ends up thrown off course and across time to a planet where the humans are slaves and the apes rule.

##AETP

It’s kind of the inverse of PETA: Apes for the Ethical Treatment of People. Helena Bonham Carter plays an ape with a heart for humans. She ends up helping our hero escape slavery and bring the humans and apes together to live in harmony.

This is a good place to talk about the makeup in the movie. For the most part, the ape makeup is spectacular (watch for this come Oscar time). Some of the lesser characters have makeup about as advanced as the original movie did 30 years ago, but the Tim Roth character’s is nothing short of amazing. My only real complaint here is that I didn’t get to see the gorgeous Helena Bonham Carter. I guess I’ll just have to watch the Mel Gibson Hamlet for that!

##Huh?

My major (and I mean MAJOR) complaint with this movie is the ending. Where the hell did that come from? I won’t spoil it here for those that haven’t seen the movie yet, but *Charlton Heston finding the Statue of Liberty* it ain’t.

Coming from a Tolkien free zone.

I went in to Peter

Jackson’s movie-the first of a trilogy-with no preconceptions. I

came out, three hours later, sorry I’d have to wait a year to see

what happens next in Frodo Baggins’s battle against the Dark

Lord, Sauron, and thinking a trip to the bookstore to pick up

“The Two Towers” might be in order… *The Movie Works*. It has real passion, real emotion,

real terror, and a tactile sense of evil that is missing in that other

current movie dealing with wizards, wonders and wickedness.

Jackson’s fierce, headlong movie takes high-flying risks: it

wears its earnestness, and its heart, on its muddy,

blood-streaked sleeve.

Only 2 1/2 weeks left!

This looks kinda fun

Here’s my take on this:

##Scenarios

###Best Case

###Worst Case

##Thinking:

Portugal is a very good team. Was a semi-finalist at the at the last European championships. Always
“just-misses” getting in the world cup because
they are part of UEFA. (Ironically enough, Italy has beating Portugal 1-0, to
keep them out the last 2 world cups. A tie in either game would have qualified
Portugal.)

US should be able to beat South Korea and will have a decent chance of beating
Poland. I think it will be a draw. Its going to be a fight for second place.
The US has to concentrate on beating South Korea by a lot of goals.

We got a chance.

The US has a real shot this world cup to advance to the Round of 16 finals. Here’s what the bracket looks like:

• South Korea
• Poland
• United States
• Portugal

Members can now be notified with updates or responses to documents.

Simply check off that you’d like notification sent on any document, and you’ll get an email letting you know if the document has been edited, or if there’s been a reply.

Polls can now have a policy on how votes will be tabulated

Up until now, only members on the site could vote in a poll. Now, each poll can have one of three policies:

1. **None**: anybody can vote any number of times. This is the default case
2. **Once per Session**: Anybody can vote, but only one time per session. This should cut down on people stuffing the ballot box.
3. **Members Only**: Only members of the site can participate in the poll (but anyon can view the results).

In most cases, this will allow anyone to participate in a poll (and should lead to some interesting results). Enjoy!

It comes down to philosophy…

This is an excellent article that covers my feelings about the books very well. Although the Harry Potter books are wonderful and fun, there’s very little depth behind the stories (which is fine for young readers, and older readers looking for an escape). But the depth in The Lord of the Rings, and the moral complexities that it tackles make it a work for the ages.