The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

A perfect visualization of Tolkien’s universe, the movie stands alone as a separate but equal work of art. This Ring rules them all!

==I made it out alive!==

I’ve been awaiting this movie for three long, torturous years (See [[Let’s Party]] from January, 1999!). I remember my first glimpses of The Shire and of Bree, grainy pictures taken by spies from fan sites. I remember finding out who was to be in the cast, and loving the names. But mostly, I remember a growing sense of anxiety and anticipation as the date approached for the release.

[[fellowship_logo]]
For the past several months leading up to the release, my wife has been playfully telling people that she was putting the house on suicide watch for December 19th. She knew, she **knew** that given how much I was looking forward to the release of this movie that it was simply not possible for it to live up to my expectations.

Thankfully, I’m still alive, and she was wrong. [[The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring]] is quite simply the best movie I’ve seen in years. To be honest, I’m not sure if a movie has ever so completely delivered on its promise.

===It’s an eleven, man===

Do you remember in the movie *This is Spinal Tap* where one of the band members expains that he has the loudest amplifier in the world because the dial goes to 11? That’s kinda like my thoughts on Fellowship. It so completely captured the emotions, settings, characters, and events of the book that it ends up having a scale of its own.

===The Wonder of it All===

I saw [[The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring]] twice on opening day, and I’m still trying to pull together coherent thoughts about the perfection of this piece of art.

==Book vs. Movie==

Yes, there are differences from the book; some of them small, and some of them not so small. But, that is irrelevant. For those of you out there that are (for some insane reason) disappointed with the movie because it doesn’t have a particular scene, or something was changed a little bit, I’d like you to consider the following.

There are many different versions of [[King Arthur]] floating around, from *Le Morte’ d’Artur” by Sir Thomas Mallory to ”Excalibur” by John Boorman, to ”The Mists of Avalon* by Marion Zimmer Bradley. Each of these brings a unique vision to the telling of a mythical tale in which the core tale is the same, but some of the details differ. Each brings a **truth** to the tale because of the power of myth.

J. R. R. Tolkien was keenly aware of this power, and with a wink and a nod presented himself not as author, but rather as translator of an old dust covered text that he uncovered and was able to decipher because of his unique understanding of ancient languages.

In the forward to the book, he explains that even he has not translated everything literally, but rather he has tried to convey in our language, as best as he can, the wonder of the tale that he discovered.

Therein lies the power of the story… it’s not in the exact details of every scene, but rather in the **Truth** of the tale.

This **Truth*’ has been captured wonderfully (the same as “Excalibur” beautifully captured the ”’Truth”’ of Arthur) in Peter Jackon’s creation, a ”’sub-sub-creation”’ of one of the greatest ‘*sub-creation** ever composed.

==The Mathematics of it==

Let me put my mathementicians hat on for a second. Consider a 2 dimensional space where the axes are defined as Expectation vs. Results. The expectations are what you take into an experience with you, and the results are what you take out. Now, if you pick a point on the graph (e,r) which describes your expectation and the results, and then draw the rectangle with that point at one extreme, and (0,0) at the other, the area of that rectangle gives you a gauge as to how good your movie going experience was: the greater the area, the better the experience.

You’ve had it happen to you before, you go into to see movie with very high expectations that it just doesn’t deliver, you get a rectangle with a small area, and you were disappointed (see the [[Star Wars Episode 1: The Phantom Menace]]).

You’ve also had it happen where you went in expecting to hate a movie, and it turns out to be pretty good. The total area of the experience is larger than you expected, so you enjoyed the movie.

Now, what happens when you go into a movie with very high expectations and the movie delivers beyond what you could have imagined? That’s called *magic” and it’s what happened with ”Fellowship of the Ring*

==The Acting==

[[frodo_sam]]
We’ll start with Sir [[Ian McKellen]], AKA Gandalf. If he isn’t exactly as you imagined Gandalf as you read the book, then you’re just wrong. His performance is so organic that I fear he will be overlooked when it comes time for the Academy to make its nominations (he was already overlooked by the Hollywood Foreign Press at the Golden Globes… what a crime!). Sir Ian McGandalf so completely captured the subleties of this complex character, from his wit to his rage, that I never perceived him acting. He simply was Gandalf.

As for the hobbits, I can’t praise them enough. When I heard they were making this into a film, I wasn’t sure how they’d be able to pull off creating hobbits without drawing attention to either little people in the roles, or special effects to make people look small. But they did, and on top of that, each of the actors emmersed themselves into their hobbit roles so completely that I never thought of them as anything but hobbits. Remarkable.

Salon: The Movie of the Year

The most heartbreaking thing about faithful moviegoing is that awe, beauty and

excitement, three of the things we go to the movies for, are the very things we’re cheated of the

most. The great wonder of [[The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring]] is that it bathes us

in all three, to the point where we remember — in a vague, pleasurably hallucinatory sensation

from another lifetime — why we go to the movies in the first place. It would be an insult to say

the picture merely lives up to its hype; it crashes the meaning of hype, exposing it as the graven

image it is. Advertising is dead: Long live moviemaking.

Dan Mitchell talks about his iPod

This just sounds way too cool.

So, before I could really do anything interesting with my iPod I had to record music onto my Powerbook.

Since I was grading papers yesterday I just popped disks into the drive as I worked until I had recorded

about 25 hours of CD music with iTunes. I connected the iPod to my Powerbook via the firewire cable and a

few minutes later I had 25 hours of music on the deck-of-cards size iPod. The iPod’s drive was only about

1/3 full.

Yes, Microsoft really is EVIL!

From the license agreement for Frontpage

You may not use the Software in

connection with any site that disparages Microsoft, MSN, MSNBC, Expedia, or their

products or services, infringe any intellectual property or other rights of these parties,

violate any state, federal or international law, or promote racism, hatred or pornography.

Is it just me, or this ridiculous? We have a Bill of Rights that guarantees us free speech in this country, but now we have Microsoft trying to control how we use their products?

Don’t forget, you’re [[Free to Think]].

Listen up Mr. President… I think you dropped the lawsuit way too quickly. It’s this kind of crap that you get when you have de facto monopolies in control of information flow.

Bob Blackwelder loves Fellowship

B-movies no longer, the fantasy genre hits its high water mark with spectacular ‘Rings’ adaptation

Zealously dedicated director Peter Jackson (“Heavenly Creatures,” “The Frighteners”) has brought the monumental ambience, the distinctive characters and the indelible spirit of “Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring” to life so tangibly that it took my breath away…
For once, here’s a gigantic-budget movie that wears its outsized grandiosity well and lives up to its hype and ambition. More importantly, the characters are perfectly cast (can you think of any actresses more elfin than Blanchett and Tyler?) and properly, reverentially steeped in Tolkien’s elaborate mythology.

Now it’s Harry’s Turn!

I believe I have just had the most perfect film experience in my life. The one that I struggle so hard to have has happened effortlessly.

Me, I’ve had a very personal reaction. It is the realization of everything that IÍve said I was hoping this would be. It is an uncompromisingly perfect telling of a fantasy tale aimed directly at the intended audience with 0% pandering, told by a team of artists helmed by a director of singular vision inspired by the God’s of old.

Spellbound by Jackson and Gandalf

This film makes Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone seem like Jackanory on a low budget.

I was going to devote today’s extended column inches to a comparative think-piece about

Lord of the Rings versus Harry Potter. But there is no comparison. Potter was made by a committee

masquerading as a director. Rings is made by a genius masquerading as a normal human being.

Hey Academy… Listen up!

Director Peter Jackson has created an oxymoron, an instant classic.

This has been a dismal year for film-making. Only the other day I was lamenting the fate of the Academy when it comes to making their end-of-year choices for the Oscars….
Fortunately, their problems have been solved. All they need to do is give Lord of the Rings every Oscar for which it is eligible and save ourselves a lot of guesswork next March….
This is the most audacious, exciting, spectacular, breathtaking, imaginative and flat-out entertaining film I have seen in quite some time.